State Highway Commission v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
176 A. 725, 114 N.J.L. 398, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 255
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heteteld, Dear, Wells, JJ. 7.
For reversal — The Chief Justice, Perskie, Van Bus-kirk, Kays, JJ. 4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State Highway Commission v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 176 A. 725, 114 N.J.L. 398, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 255 (N.J. 1935).
176 A. 725 (State Highway Commission v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.