State Funding Corp. v. Twindale Homes, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

State Funding Corp. v. Twindale Homes, Inc.

22 A.D.2d 924, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2483

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 21, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 22 A.D.2d 924 (State Funding Corp. v. Twindale Homes, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Funding Corp. v. Twindale Homes, Inc., 22 A.D.2d 924, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2483 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion [No. 2447] by State Funding Corporation; the plaintiff in Action No. 1 and the defendant in Action No. 2, and by the Investors Collateral C:orp. and Veterans Funding Corp., defendants in Action No. 2, to dismiss the appeal as to them on the ground that the notice of appeal, although filed, was not served upon them; and on the further ground that the appeal relates to portions of an order in which they are not involved. Motion denied. [See Motion No. 2448, decided herewith.] Motion by the defendant-respondent Max Kaufman to dismiss the appeal for lack of prosecution denied. Cross motion [No. 2448] by appellant Jacob Neuman, pursuant to statute (CPLR 5520), to extend his time to serve a copy of the notice of appeal upon each of the three movants in Motion No. 2447, granted (see 8 Carmody-Wait, New York Practice, p. 599). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion [No. 2447] by State Funding Corporation; the plaintiff in Action No. 1 and the defendant in Action No. 2, and by the Investors Collateral C:orp. and Veterans Funding Corp., defendants in Action No. 2, to dismiss the appeal as to them on the ground that the notice of appeal, although filed, was not served upon them; and on the further ground that the appeal relates to portions of an order in which they are not involved. Motion denied. [See Motion No. 2448, decided herewith.] Motion by the defendant-respondent Max Kaufman to dismiss the appeal for lack of prosecution denied. Cross motion [No. 2448] by appellant Jacob Neuman, pursuant to statute (CPLR 5520), to extend his time to serve a copy of the notice of appeal upon each of the three movants in Motion No. 2447, granted (see 8 Carmody-Wait, New York Practice, p. 599). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 A.D.2d 924, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-funding-corp-v-twindale-homes-inc-nyappdiv-1964.