State (Fenner, Complainant,) v. Luther
This text of 8 R.I. 151 (State (Fenner, Complainant,) v. Luther) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is true, that in the clause of the statute relied upon, neither the word “ maliciously ” nor the word “ wantonly ” is employed to characterize the offence, as in other clauses of the same act. Still, we cannot hold that the legislature intended that a person should be convicted and punished, as for a larceny, for taking property openly, under a fair claim of right. We think it should have been left to the jury to *155 determine, upon the evidence, whether the defendant honestly, in good faith, believed the property in question was his own. The charge of the court, as we interpret it, was not of this character.
The defendant’s exceptions are sustained, and a new trial is ordered in the Court of Common Pleas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 R.I. 151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-fenner-complainant-v-luther-ri-1865.