State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Trovato

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Trovato

201 A.D.2d 573, 609 N.Y.S.2d 812, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1220

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 14, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 201 A.D.2d 573 (State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Trovato) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Trovato, 201 A.D.2d 573, 609 N.Y.S.2d 812, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1220 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, the appeal is from (1) an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kassoff, J.), dated March 9, 1990, which permanently stayed arbitration, and (2) an order of the same court, dated September 19, 1991, which denied the petitioner’s motion pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (3) to vacate the order and judgment dated March 9, 1990.

Ordered that the appeal from the order and judgment dated March 9, 1990, is dismissed for failure to perfect the same in accordance with the rules of this Court (see, 22 NYCRR 670.8 [e]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated September 19, 1991 is affirmed, for reasons stated by Justice Kassoff at the Supreme Court; and it is further,

Ordered that the petitioner is awarded one bill of costs. Thompson, J. P., O’Brien, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, the appeal is from (1) an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kassoff, J.), dated March 9, 1990, which permanently stayed arbitration, and (2) an order of the same court, dated September 19, 1991, which denied the petitioner’s motion pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (3) to vacate the order and judgment dated March 9, 1990.

Ordered that the appeal from the order and judgment dated March 9, 1990, is dismissed for failure to perfect the same in accordance with the rules of this Court (see, 22 NYCRR 670.8 [e]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated September 19, 1991 is affirmed, for reasons stated by Justice Kassoff at the Supreme Court; and it is further,

Ordered that the petitioner is awarded one bill of costs. Thompson, J. P., O’Brien, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 A.D.2d 573, 609 N.Y.S.2d 812, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-v-trovato-nyappdiv-1994.