State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Tortorici
708 So. 2d 1016, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3207, 1998 WL 144898
This text of 708 So. 2d 1016 (State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Tortorici) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Tortorici, 708 So. 2d 1016, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3207, 1998 WL 144898 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
Opinion
We find error in the trial court’s entry of a directed verdict on Appellant’s seat belt defense. Appellant presented competent evidence from which a jury could conclude that Appellee was comparatively negligent. See Ridley v. Safety Kleen Corp., 693 So.2d 934 (Fla.1996). Therefore, we reverse and remand for a new trial on liability and damages.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ridley v. Safety Kleen Corp.
693 So. 2d 934 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1997)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
708 So. 2d 1016, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3207, 1998 WL 144898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-v-tortorici-fladistctapp-1998.