State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Rodriguez

121 A.D.2d 386, 503 N.Y.S.2d 95, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58326

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 2, 1986·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7511 (b) (1) (i) to vacate an arbitrator’s award on the ground of alleged fraud made in conjunction with a claim brought against an automobile insurer, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kelly, J.), dated December 10, 1984, which denied its application, confirmed the arbitrator’s award, and granted the respondents leave to enter a judgment against the petitioner for the amount of the award plus interest.

Order affirmed, with costs.

There is no ground for vacatur based on a mere suspicion of fraud. Lazer, J. P., Bracken, Weinstein and Fiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7511 (b) (1) (i) to vacate an arbitrator’s award on the ground of alleged fraud made in conjunction with a claim brought against an automobile insurer, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kelly, J.), dated December 10, 1984, which denied its application, confirmed the arbitrator’s award, and granted the respondents leave to enter a judgment against the petitioner for the amount of the award plus interest.

Order affirmed, with costs.

There is no ground for vacatur based on a mere suspicion of fraud. Lazer, J. P., Bracken, Weinstein and Fiber, JJ., concur.

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Rodriguez, 121 A.D.2d 386, 503 N.Y.S.2d 95, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58326 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

121 A.D.2d 386 (State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related