State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Rinaldi

27 A.D.3d 476, 810 N.Y.S.2d 346
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 7, 2006
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 27 A.D.3d 476 (State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Rinaldi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Rinaldi, 27 A.D.3d 476, 810 N.Y.S.2d 346 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration, Maria Rinaldi appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Bucaria, J.), entered December 20, 2004, which granted the petition and permanently stayed the arbitration.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Where, as here, “an insured previously gives timely notice of the accident, the carrier must establish that it is prejudiced by a [477]*477late notice of SUM claim before it may properly disclaim coverage” (Rekemeyer v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 4 NY3d 468, 476 [2005]). No such showing of prejudice was made by the carrier in this case. Nevertheless, because Rekemeyer was decided after the order appealed from was issued, we remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, “for the carrier to have an opportunity to demonstrate prejudice,” if any (id. at 476) and, thereafter, for a new determination. Adams, J.P., Skelos, Fisher and Lunn, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

LaRocca v. Lauer
2025 NY Slip Op 04463 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
New York Central Mutual Insurance v. Davalos
39 A.D.3d 654 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance v. Ward
38 A.D.3d 898 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Allcity Insurance v. Rhymes
29 A.D.3d 787 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 A.D.3d 476, 810 N.Y.S.2d 346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-v-rinaldi-nyappdiv-2006.