State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Mavroidakos

63 A.D.2d 933, 406 N.Y.S.2d 87, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11955
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 20, 1978
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 63 A.D.2d 933 (State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Mavroidakos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Mavroidakos, 63 A.D.2d 933, 406 N.Y.S.2d 87, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11955 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County, entered August 24, 1976, which granted petitioner’s motion for a permanent stay of arbitration, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, and the stay denied and arbitration directed, with $40 costs and disbursements of this appeal to appellant. The respondent-appellant was a passenger in an automobile involved in a collision with a vehicle owned by the respondent Briggs Leasing Corp. and leased to respondent Berton. Appellant made a demand upon the petitioner insurance company which insured the vehicle in which she was riding, for arbitration for personal injuries under the uninsured motorists endorsement of their policy, on the ground that the other vehicle belonging to Briggs had been stolen and was therefore uninsured. It is clear that the offending vehicle was stolen and uninsured, but the court at trial found the leasing company to be negligent in allowing the offending vehicle to be stolen, and accordingly the order embodying the findings at trial was entered, staying the arbitration. At issue is the meaning of subdivision (a) of section 1210 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law (see, also, § 1100). The unattended motor vehicle was stolen from the leasing company’s parking lot. The individual Berton was its service manager. The keys were in his office on a board with numbered tags. We have heretofore held that in a similar situation the parking lot would not be considered a "highway or a private road open to public motor vehicle traffic”. (See Beck v Coby, 52 AD2d 559.) Accordingly, subdivision (a) of section 1210 is not applicable, and therefore Briggs and Berton cannot be considered to have been negligent. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Evans, Fein, Lane and Markewich, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zwerdling v. Gillis
99 A.D.2d 564 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
People v. Kenyon
85 A.D.2d 916 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
People v. Edsall
111 Misc. 2d 767 (Dix Town Court, 1981)
People v. Conzo
100 Misc. 2d 143 (New York Supreme Court, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 A.D.2d 933, 406 N.Y.S.2d 87, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-v-mavroidakos-nyappdiv-1978.