State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Leesville Lumber Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Leesville Lumber Co.

295 So. 2d 451, 1974 La. App. LEXIS 4302

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedMay 24, 1974

DocketNo. 4563

StatusPublished

This text of 295 So. 2d 451 (State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Leesville Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Leesville Lumber Co., 295 So. 2d 451, 1974 La. App. LEXIS 4302 (La. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

CULPEPPER, Judge.

This is a companion case to Tommy E. Smith, et al. v. The Hartford Insurance Group et al., La.App., 295 So.2d 447 in which a separate opinion is rendered by us this date.- In the present case, the plaintiff, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, carried liability and extended coverage insurance on the Smith vehicle. It paid to the Smiths the sum of $2,000 in medical expenses and $914.36 for repairs to their vehicle. Judgment for these amounts was rendered in favor of State Farm and against the defendants, Rotary Sowell, William Baggett and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, in solido. These defendant appealed.

For the reasons stated in the companion case, the judgment in the present matter is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are assessed against the defendants who are cast.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CULPEPPER, Judge.

This is a companion case to Tommy E. Smith, et al. v. The Hartford Insurance Group et al., La.App., 295 So.2d 447 in which a separate opinion is rendered by us this date.- In the present case, the plaintiff, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, carried liability and extended coverage insurance on the Smith vehicle. It paid to the Smiths the sum of $2,000 in medical expenses and $914.36 for repairs to their vehicle. Judgment for these amounts was rendered in favor of State Farm and against the defendants, Rotary Sowell, William Baggett and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, in solido. These defendant appealed.

For the reasons stated in the companion case, the judgment in the present matter is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are assessed against the defendants who are cast.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

295 So. 2d 451, 1974 La. App. LEXIS 4302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-v-leesville-lumber-co-lactapp-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack