State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Hollis

228 A.D.2d 685, 646 N.Y.2d 29, 646 N.Y.S.2d 29, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7439
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 24, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The Supreme Court properly granted the petitioner’s application to stay arbitration. Underinsured motorists benefits are available when the bodily injury liability limits of the offending vehicle are less than the bodily injury liability limits of the insured’s policy (see, Insurance Law § 3420 [f] [2]; Maurizzio v Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., 73 NY2d 951; Matter of Federal Ins. Co. v Reingold, 181 AD2d 769). Here the bodily injury liability limits of $100,000 per person and $300,000 per accident in the appellants’ policy were equal to the bodily injury liability limits of the offending vehicle’s policy. Thus, the underinsured motorist endorsement of the petitioner’s policy is not triggered. O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Hollis, 228 A.D.2d 685, 646 N.Y.2d 29, 646 N.Y.S.2d 29, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7439 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

228 A.D.2d 685 (State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Hollis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
246 A.D.2d 593 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)