State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Glover

202 So. 2d 106, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4257
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 28, 1967
DocketNo. 674
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 202 So. 2d 106 (State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Glover) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Glover, 202 So. 2d 106, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4257 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company appeals from a final judgment holding that Earl Andrew Glover, ap-pellee, and plaintiff in the lower court, was entitled to coverage of uninsured motorist protection. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in failing to apply the final proviso of F.S.A. § 627.0851(1) retroactively, as amended on July 1, 1963.

Norman E. Sharp owned a 1956 Chevrolet and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company issued a policy on December 13, 1960, on said car and Sharp executed in writing a rejection of uninsured motorist coverage on December 11, 1961, according to F.S.A. § 627.0851(1), describing said Chevrolet.

Effective July 1, 1963, the following amendment was added to said statute:

“ * * * provided further that, unless the named insured requests such coverage in writing, the coverage need not be provided in or supplemental to a renewal policy where the named insured had re[107]*107jected the coverage in connection with a policy previously issued to him by the same insurer.”

On November 16, 1963, State Farm issued a new policy covering a 1962 Comet and on November 24, 1963, an accident occurred with an uninsured motorist. State Farm did not receive a rejection in writing on this new policy but depended on the December 11, 1961, rejection.

The lower court held that the 1963 amendment of F.S.A. § 627.0851(1) was not retroactive and this court affirms the judgment of the lower court.

Affirmed.

ANDREWS and CROSS, J J., and LEAVENGOOD, C. RICHARD, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v. Sheffield
375 So. 2d 598 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Glover v. Aetna Ins. Co.
363 So. 2d 12 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Allstate Insurance v. Duffy
237 So. 2d 225 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
202 So. 2d 106, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-v-glover-fladistctapp-1967.