State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Foster
867 A.2d 1262, 581 Pa. 623, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 95
This text of 867 A.2d 1262 (State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Foster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Foster, 867 A.2d 1262, 581 Pa. 623, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 95 (Pa. 2005).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 18th day of January, 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby granted, limited to the following issue:
Whether the Pennsylvania Superior Court erred in effectively overturning this Court’s holding and rationale in Brakeman v. Potomac Insurance Co.[, 236 Pa.Super. 320, 344 A.2d 555 (1975)] when ruling that an insured’s failure to report a hit-and-run accident results in a per se forfeiture of his or her uninsured motorist benefits, even absent a showing of prejudice to the insurance company?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Brakeman v. Potomac Insurance
344 A.2d 555 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1975)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
867 A.2d 1262, 581 Pa. 623, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 95, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-v-foster-pa-2005.