State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Estes
237 N.E.2d 257, 250 Ind. 476, 1968 Ind. LEXIS 673
Opinion
The appellant filed a petition to transfer to the Supreme Court. In the Appellate Court opinion 233 N. E. [477]*4772d 253, 142 Ind. App. —, the Appellate Court among other things said:
“Since we do not have the evidence before us we, on appeal, presume there was evidence to support the action of the trial court. The burden is upon appellant to demonstrate that none of the reasons given are valid and to affirmatively demonstrate an abuse of discretion by the trial court in the granting of the motion for a new trial. Griffith v. Matthew, supra, (1967), [141 Ind. App. 462], 229 N. E. 2d 657, 658, 11 Ind. Dec. 181 (Trans. Denied).”
We correct the foregoing paragraph to delete the first sentence thereof. The petition to transfer is denied.
Note. — Reported in 237 N. E. 2d 257.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Estes, 237 N.E.2d 257, 250 Ind. 476, 1968 Ind. LEXIS 673 (Ind. 1968).
237 N.E.2d 257 (State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Estes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Moore v. Berry Refining Co.
248 N.E.2d 398 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1969)
Landers v. McCOMB WINDOW & DOOR CO., INC.
248 N.E.2d 358 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1969)
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Estes
233 N.E.2d 253 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1968)
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INS. CO. v. Estes
233 N.E.2d 253 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1968)