State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Davis

87 S.E.2d 348, 91 Ga. App. 850, 1955 Ga. App. LEXIS 885
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 18, 1955·No. 35583·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Nichols, J.

While by the action the plaintiff seeks subrogation against thé defendant for reasons stated in the petition, it is not alleged that the collision referred to in the suit between the defendant here and E. L. Gammage involves the same collision which resulted in the plaintiff paying a claim to the defendant in the amount of $2,610. The petition, therefore, failed to set forth a cause of action for subrogation because it failed to show that the defendant here, after the plaintiff paid his claim, obtained a verdict and judgment against the same person who caused the collision on September 6, 1949. Accordingly, the trial court did not err in sustaining the general demurrer on this ground.

In view of the above ruling, the other ground of general demurrer need not be considered.

Judgment affirmed.

Felton, C. J., and Quillian, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Davis, 87 S.E.2d 348, 91 Ga. App. 850, 1955 Ga. App. LEXIS 885 (Ga. Ct. App. 1955).

87 S.E.2d 348 (State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clark v. American Casualty Co.
99 S.E.2d 897 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)