State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Davis
Opinion
While by the action the plaintiff seeks subrogation against thé defendant for reasons stated in the petition, it is not alleged that the collision referred to in the suit between the defendant here and E. L. Gammage involves the same collision which resulted in the plaintiff paying a claim to the defendant in the amount of $2,610. The petition, therefore, failed to set forth a cause of action for subrogation because it failed to show that the defendant here, after the plaintiff paid his claim, obtained a verdict and judgment against the same person who caused the collision on September 6, 1949. Accordingly, the trial court did not err in sustaining the general demurrer on this ground.
In view of the above ruling, the other ground of general demurrer need not be considered.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
87 S.E.2d 348 (State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.