State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Budell

91 A.D.2d 614, 458 N.Y.S.2d 195, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19462

This text of 91 A.D.2d 614 (State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Budell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Budell, 91 A.D.2d 614, 458 N.Y.S.2d 195, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19462 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

— In a proceeding pursuant to [615]*615CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration of a claim under the uninsured motorist provisions of an automobile liability policy, Gert Budell and Sara Jimenez appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much or an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Graci, J.), dated June 4,1982, as directed a hearing on the issue of whether the “alleged offending vehicle was uninsured etc.” Appeal dismissed, sua sponte, without costs or disbursements. (See Matter of State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. v Meneses, 91 AD2d 615.) Damiani, J. P., Lazer, Mangano and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Farm Mutual Insurance v. Meneses
91 A.D.2d 615 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 A.D.2d 614, 458 N.Y.S.2d 195, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-v-budell-nyappdiv-1982.