State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Russelle L. Lawson
317 F.2d 925, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5007
This text of 317 F.2d 925 (State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Russelle L. Lawson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Russelle L. Lawson, 317 F.2d 925, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5007 (5th Cir. 1963).
Opinion
The sole question presented for review is whether the district court erred in denying the appellant’s, defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. We agree with the district court that the evidence-presented a case for the jury’s determination. The judgment is therefore
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
317 F.2d 925, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-company-v-russelle-l-lawson-ca5-1963.