State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Russelle L. Lawson
317 F.2d 925, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5007
Opinion
The sole question presented for review is whether the district court erred in denying the appellant’s, defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. We agree with the district court that the evidence-presented a case for the jury’s determination. The judgment is therefore
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Russelle L. Lawson, 317 F.2d 925, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5007 (5th Cir. 1963).
317 F.2d 925 (State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Russelle L. Lawson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.