State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Mario Topete

Court of Appeals of Texas

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Mario Topete

DecidedApril 4, 2023

Docket14-22-00098-CV

StatusPublished

This text of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Mario Topete (State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Mario Topete) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Mario Topete, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 4, 2023.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00098-CV

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant

V.

MARIO TOPETE, Appellee

On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2018-76103

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is from a judgment signed January 14, 2022. No clerk’s record has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record.

On February 14, 2023, notification was transmitted to appellant of the court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). No response was filed to that notice. On March 14, 2023, appellant was ordered to demonstrate to this court within 10 days that arrangements had been made to pay for the clerk’s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). In the order, the court notified appellant that failure to comply with the court’s order would make the appeal subject to dismissal without further notice for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant has not filed any response demonstrating it has made arrangements to pay for the record. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Jewell and Spain.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 4, 2023.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00098-CV

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant

V.

MARIO TOPETE, Appellee

On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2018-76103

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is from a judgment signed January 14, 2022. No clerk’s record has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record.

On February 14, 2023, notification was transmitted to appellant of the court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). No response was filed to that notice. On March 14, 2023, appellant was ordered to demonstrate to this court within 10 days that arrangements had been made to pay for the clerk’s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). In the order, the court notified appellant that failure to comply with the court’s order would make the appeal subject to dismissal without further notice for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant has not filed any response demonstrating it has made arrangements to pay for the record. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Jewell and Spain.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Mario Topete, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-company-v-mario-topete-texapp-2023.