State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Lampila

M.D. Florida

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Lampila

DecidedAugust 24, 2023

Docket2:23-cv-00342

StatusUnknown

This text of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Lampila (State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Lampila) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Lampila, (M.D. Fla. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 2:23-cv-342-SPC-KCD

JEFFREY LAMPILA and SIESTA PEBBLE, INC.,

Defendants. / ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 14.) Because the motion fails to comply with the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, 50 U.S.C. § 3931, it is denied without prejudice.1 Under the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, for “any civil action . . . in which the defendant does not make an appearance,” the court, “before entering judgment for the plaintiff, shall require the plaintiff to file with the court an affidavit—(A) stating whether or not the defendant is in military service and showing necessary facts to support the affidavit; or (B) if the plaintiff is unable to determine whether or not the defendant is in military service, stating that

1 “[A] magistrate judge ha[s] authority to deny [a] motion for default judgment.” Franklin v. Parnell, 461 F. App’x 823, 825 n.2 (11th Cir. 2011) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A)). the plaintiff is unable to determine whether or not the defendant is in military service.” 50 U.S.C. § 3931(b)(1). “The requirement for an affidavit ... may be satisfied by a statement, declaration, verification, or certificate, in writing, subscribed and certified or declared to be true under penalty of perjury.” Id. § 3931(b)(4). Here, State Farm does not state whether Jeffrey Lampila is in the military service of the United States. Based on the statutory language, State Farm must submit an affidavit that provides necessary facts to support that Lampila is not a service member. See Southeast Farms, Inc. v. Watkins, No. 3:19-cv-565-J-32MCR, 2019 WL 13155429 (M.D. Fla. Oct. 28, 2019). The Court has no such facts here. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: Plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 14) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Any renewed motion for default judgment must be filed by September 1, 2023. ENTERED in Fort Myers, Florida on August 24, 2023.

flO yon 4 CL Tae Kile C. Dudek United States Magistrate Judge Copies: All Parties of Record

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 2:23-cv-342-SPC-KCD

JEFFREY LAMPILA and SIESTA PEBBLE, INC.,

Defendants. / ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 14.) Because the motion fails to comply with the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, 50 U.S.C. § 3931, it is denied without prejudice.1 Under the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, for “any civil action . . . in which the defendant does not make an appearance,” the court, “before entering judgment for the plaintiff, shall require the plaintiff to file with the court an affidavit—(A) stating whether or not the defendant is in military service and showing necessary facts to support the affidavit; or (B) if the plaintiff is unable to determine whether or not the defendant is in military service, stating that

1 “[A] magistrate judge ha[s] authority to deny [a] motion for default judgment.” Franklin v. Parnell, 461 F. App’x 823, 825 n.2 (11th Cir. 2011) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A)). the plaintiff is unable to determine whether or not the defendant is in military service.” 50 U.S.C. § 3931(b)(1). “The requirement for an affidavit ... may be satisfied by a statement, declaration, verification, or certificate, in writing, subscribed and certified or declared to be true under penalty of perjury.” Id. § 3931(b)(4). Here, State Farm does not state whether Jeffrey Lampila is in the military service of the United States. Based on the statutory language, State Farm must submit an affidavit that provides necessary facts to support that Lampila is not a service member. See Southeast Farms, Inc. v. Watkins, No. 3:19-cv-565-J-32MCR, 2019 WL 13155429 (M.D. Fla. Oct. 28, 2019). The Court has no such facts here. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: Plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 14) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Any renewed motion for default judgment must be filed by September 1, 2023. ENTERED in Fort Myers, Florida on August 24, 2023.

flO yon 4 CL Tae Kile C. Dudek United States Magistrate Judge Copies: All Parties of Record

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Lampila, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-company-v-lampila-flmd-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack