State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. CROYLE ENTERPRISES, INC.
886 N.E.2d 794, 10 N.Y.3d 800, 10 N.Y. 800, 857 N.Y.S.2d 30, 2008 N.Y. LEXIS 644
This text of 886 N.E.2d 794 (State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. CROYLE ENTERPRISES, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. CROYLE ENTERPRISES, INC., 886 N.E.2d 794, 10 N.Y.3d 800, 10 N.Y. 800, 857 N.Y.S.2d 30, 2008 N.Y. LEXIS 644 (N.Y. 2008).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that Croyle Enterprises, Inc. must appear by attorney {see CPLR 321 [a]), and Damian Croyle, who is not an attorney, may not act as its authorized legal representative.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
886 N.E.2d 794, 10 N.Y.3d 800, 10 N.Y. 800, 857 N.Y.S.2d 30, 2008 N.Y. LEXIS 644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-company-v-croyle-enterprises-inc-ny-2008.