State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. CROYLE ENTERPRISES, INC.
886 N.E.2d 794, 10 N.Y.3d 800, 10 N.Y. 800, 857 N.Y.S.2d 30, 2008 N.Y. LEXIS 644
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that Croyle Enterprises, Inc. must appear by attorney {see CPLR 321 [a]), and Damian Croyle, who is not an attorney, may not act as its authorized legal representative.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. CROYLE ENTERPRISES, INC., 886 N.E.2d 794, 10 N.Y.3d 800, 10 N.Y. 800, 857 N.Y.S.2d 30, 2008 N.Y. LEXIS 644 (N.Y. 2008).
886 N.E.2d 794 (State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. CROYLE ENTERPRISES, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.