State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Sewell

151 S.E.2d 231, 114 Ga. App. 331, 1966 Ga. App. LEXIS 749
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 16, 1966·No. 42252·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Jordan, Judge.

Under the decision of this court in Georgia Life &c. Ins. Co. v. Sewell, 113 Ga. App. 443 (1) (148 SE2d 447), which involved the same plaintiff and the same accident and a similar policy provision, the excerpt from the charge complained of was not erroneous for any reasons enumerated, and [332]*332since the evidence, differing only slightly from that in the above stated case, did not demand a verdict for the defendant the trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion for directed verdict and the subsequent motion for a new trial.

Submitted September 6, 1966 Decided September 16, 1966 Rehearing denied September 23, 1966 Heard & Leverett, E. Freeman Leverett, for appellant. McClure, Ramsay & Struble, Robert B. Struble, Joseph S. Skelton, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Sewell, 151 S.E.2d 231, 114 Ga. App. 331, 1966 Ga. App. LEXIS 749 (Ga. Ct. App. 1966).

151 S.E.2d 231 (State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Sewell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barge & Co. v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance
295 S.E.2d 851 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)
Strickland v. Gulf Life Insurance
242 S.E.2d 148 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1978)
Travelers Insurance v. Pratt
203 S.E.2d 302 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Sewell
153 S.E.2d 731 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1967)