State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Sewell
This text of 151 S.E.2d 231 (State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Sewell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Under the decision of this court in Georgia Life &c. Ins. Co. v. Sewell, 113 Ga. App. 443 (1) (148 SE2d 447), which involved the same plaintiff and the same accident and a similar policy provision, the excerpt from the charge complained of was not erroneous for any reasons enumerated, and [332]*332since the evidence, differing only slightly from that in the above stated case, did not demand a verdict for the defendant the trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion for directed verdict and the subsequent motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
151 S.E.2d 231, 114 Ga. App. 331, 1966 Ga. App. LEXIS 749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-co-v-sewell-gactapp-1966.