State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Risatti

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Risatti

871 So. 2d 1037, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6265, 2004 WL 950715

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 5, 2004·No. No. 4D04-93·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We deny the petition for writ of certio-rari. This denial is without prejudice for petitioner to raise an attorney-client privilege objection to the disclosure of any document pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(b)(5). The issue was not waived below because the trial court’s order contemplated that objections could be made at the deposition of the records custodian.

STEVENSON, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We deny the petition for writ of certio-rari. This denial is without prejudice for petitioner to raise an attorney-client privilege objection to the disclosure of any document pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(b)(5). The issue was not waived below because the trial court’s order contemplated that objections could be made at the deposition of the records custodian.

STEVENSON, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Risatti, 871 So. 2d 1037, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6265, 2004 WL 950715 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

871 So. 2d 1037 (State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Risatti) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.