State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Pritchard

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Pritchard

207 So. 3d 740, 2016 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 97

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Pritchard. Read the opinion of the Court — 2015 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 128 →

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided April 22, 2016·No. 2130989·Published

Opinion

On Remand, from the Alabama Supreme CouH

PER CURIAM.

This court’s prior judgment has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Alabama Supreme Court. Ex parte State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 207 So.3d 734, [741]*741739 (Ala.2016). In compliance with the supreme court’s opinion, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the cause with instructions to the trial court to enter a judgment denying the request of James Ross Pritchard, Jr., that State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company pay a pro rata share of the attorney fees incurred by Pritchard “for the recovery of moneys advanced by State Farm ... pursuant to Lambert v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 576 So.2d 160 (Ala.1991).” Ex parte State Farm, 207 So.3d at 735.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

THOMPSON, P.J., and PITTMAN, THOMAS, MOORE, and DONALDSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On Remand, from the Alabama Supreme CouH

PER CURIAM.

This court’s prior judgment has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Alabama Supreme Court. Ex parte State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 207 So.3d 734, [741]*741739 (Ala.2016). In compliance with the supreme court’s opinion, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the cause with instructions to the trial court to enter a judgment denying the request of James Ross Pritchard, Jr., that State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company pay a pro rata share of the attorney fees incurred by Pritchard “for the recovery of moneys advanced by State Farm ... pursuant to Lambert v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 576 So.2d 160 (Ala.1991).” Ex parte State Farm, 207 So.3d at 735.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

THOMPSON, P.J., and PITTMAN, THOMAS, MOORE, and DONALDSON, JJ., concur.

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Pritchard, 207 So. 3d 740, 2016 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 97 (Ala. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

207 So. 3d 740 (State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Pritchard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related