State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Pritchard
This text of 207 So. 3d 740 (State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Pritchard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On Remand, from the Alabama Supreme CouH
This court’s prior judgment has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Alabama Supreme Court. Ex parte State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 207 So.3d 734, [741]*741739 (Ala.2016). In compliance with the supreme court’s opinion, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the cause with instructions to the trial court to enter a judgment denying the request of James Ross Pritchard, Jr., that State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company pay a pro rata share of the attorney fees incurred by Pritchard “for the recovery of moneys advanced by State Farm ... pursuant to Lambert v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 576 So.2d 160 (Ala.1991).” Ex parte State Farm, 207 So.3d at 735.
REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
207 So. 3d 740, 2016 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-co-v-pritchard-alacivapp-2016.