State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Heppelle

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Heppelle

528 So. 2d 505, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1672, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3020, 1988 WL 72244

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 13, 1988·No. No. 87-2777·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

LEHAN, Judge.

We reverse the trial court’s final summary judgment which determined that plaintiff was entitled to uninsured motorist coverage equal to the $100,000 bodily injury coverage provided by the policy. This ease is controlled by Marchesano v. Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Co., 506 So.2d 410 (Fla.1987).

We do not agree with plaintiffs argument that Marchesano is materially distinguishable. See Landi v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co., 529 So.2d 1170 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent herewith.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and PARKER, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LEHAN, Judge.

We reverse the trial court’s final summary judgment which determined that plaintiff was entitled to uninsured motorist coverage equal to the $100,000 bodily injury coverage provided by the policy. This ease is controlled by Marchesano v. Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Co., 506 So.2d 410 (Fla.1987).

We do not agree with plaintiffs argument that Marchesano is materially distinguishable. See Landi v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co., 529 So.2d 1170 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent herewith.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and PARKER, J., concur.

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Heppelle, 528 So. 2d 505, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1672, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3020, 1988 WL 72244 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

528 So. 2d 505 (State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Heppelle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related