State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Grimm
This text of 630 So. 2d 970 (State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Grimm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
For the reasons expressed in Ourso v. Grimm, 630 So.2d 963 (La.App. 3d Cir.1993), the judgment in favor of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company is affirmed, as amended.
AFFIRMED AS AMENDED.
KNOLL, J., concurs for reasons assigned in Ourso v. Grimm.
SAUNDERS, J., dissents for reasons assigned in Ourso v. Grimm.
WOODARD, ^J., concurs for reasons assigned by KNOLL, J., in Ourso v. Grimm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
630 So. 2d 970, 92 La.App. 3 Cir. 1275, 1994 La. App. LEXIS 3, 1994 WL 14485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-co-v-grimm-lactapp-1994.