State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Garcia
621 So. 2d 475, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5853, 1993 WL 174880
Opinion
At the time the trial court ordered a new trial on the grounds that the jury verdict was against the manifest weight of the evidence, it did not have the benefit of the recent Florida Supreme Court opinion Easkold v. Rhodes, 614 So.2d 495 (Fla.1993). The Easkold court held that the jury could properly reach a finding contrary to uncon-tradicted expert witness testimony. Therefore, we reverse and remand with instructions to the trial court to enter a judgment for Appellant in accordance with the jury verdict.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Garcia, 621 So. 2d 475, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5853, 1993 WL 174880 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
621 So. 2d 475 (State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Garcia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
REPUBLIC SERVICES OF FLORIDA v. Poucher
851 So. 2d 866 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Thomas
637 So. 2d 1008 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
US Fidelity & Guar. Co. v. Perez
622 So. 2d 486 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Rigdon v. State
621 So. 2d 475 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)