State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Curran
135 So. 3d 280, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 122, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 954, 2014 WL 1058134
This text of 135 So. 3d 280 (State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Curran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Curran, 135 So. 3d 280, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 122, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 954, 2014 WL 1058134 (Fla. 2014).
Opinion
dissenting.
Because I would order the trial court to vacate the judgment against State Farm, I would deny Curran’s motion for attorney’s fees and grant State Farm’s Case No. SC12-157 Page 2 motion for attorney’s fees, conditioned upon the trial court’s finding that State Farm is entitled to fees pursuant to its proposal for settlement.
CANADY, J., concurs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
135 So. 3d 280, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 122, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 954, 2014 WL 1058134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-co-v-curran-fla-2014.