State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Baggett

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Baggett

108 So. 3d 1009, 2012 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 291, 2012 WL 5278469

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided October 26, 2012·No. 2100221·Published

Opinion

After Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

THOMPSON, Presiding Judge.

This court, on February 4, 2011, affirmed the trial court’s judgment, without an opinion. 97 So.3d 816 (Ala.Civ.App.[1010]*10102011) (table). This court’s judgment has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. Ex parte State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 108 So.3d 1008 (Ala.2012). In compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is reversed for that court to order Baggett to reimburse State Farm in the amount of $25,000.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

PITTMAN, BRYAN, THOMAS, and MOORE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

After Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

THOMPSON, Presiding Judge.

This court, on February 4, 2011, affirmed the trial court’s judgment, without an opinion. 97 So.3d 816 (Ala.Civ.App.[1010]*10102011) (table). This court’s judgment has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. Ex parte State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 108 So.3d 1008 (Ala.2012). In compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is reversed for that court to order Baggett to reimburse State Farm in the amount of $25,000.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

PITTMAN, BRYAN, THOMAS, and MOORE, JJ., concur.

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Baggett, 108 So. 3d 1009, 2012 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 291, 2012 WL 5278469 (Ala. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

108 So. 3d 1009 (State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Baggett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related