State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Baggett

108 So. 3d 1009, 2012 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 291, 2012 WL 5278469
CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama
DecidedOctober 26, 2012
Docket2100221
StatusPublished

This text of 108 So. 3d 1009 (State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Baggett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Baggett, 108 So. 3d 1009, 2012 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 291, 2012 WL 5278469 (Ala. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

After Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

THOMPSON, Presiding Judge.

This court, on February 4, 2011, affirmed the trial court’s judgment, without an opinion. 97 So.3d 816 (Ala.Civ.App.[1010]*10102011) (table). This court’s judgment has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. Ex parte State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 108 So.3d 1008 (Ala.2012). In compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is reversed for that court to order Baggett to reimburse State Farm in the amount of $25,000.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

PITTMAN, BRYAN, THOMAS, and MOORE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Baggett
108 So. 3d 1008 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
108 So. 3d 1009, 2012 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 291, 2012 WL 5278469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-co-v-baggett-alacivapp-2012.