State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Gulledge
This text of 850 So. 2d 631 (State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Gulledge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm without comment all issues raised by appellant/cross-appellee, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., and appellees/cross-appellants, Brenda and Terry Gulledge, in this appeal and cross-appeal from a final judgment entered in this action for uninsured motorist benefits, except that relating to the lower court’s error in denying State Farm’s motion to reduce Brenda Gulledge’s damage award for past lost earning ability by the amount of Social Security disability payments she received as a result of her accidental injuries. As to this issue, we reverse and remand the case to the trial court with directions that the amount so paid be deducted from the sum awarded.
In defending the trial court’s decision, the Gulledges contend the collateral-source setoff statute1 is inapplicable, because they claimed loss of earning capacity, not lost wages. We cannot agree. A plain reading of the statute offers no support for the distinction the Gulledges argue. In[632]*632deed, they cite no case law supporting their argument.
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
850 So. 2d 631, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11112, 2003 WL 21704435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-farm-mutual-automobile-ins-co-v-gulledge-fladistctapp-2003.