State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Cruz-Cordero

2026 NY Slip Op 30890(U)
CourtNew York Supreme Court, New York County
DecidedMarch 10, 2026
DocketIndex No. 153698/2024
StatusUnpublished
AuthorJames G. Clynes

This text of 2026 NY Slip Op 30890(U) (State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Cruz-Cordero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, New York County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Cruz-Cordero, 2026 NY Slip Op 30890(U) (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2026).

Opinion

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v Cruz-Cordero 2026 NY Slip Op 30890(U) March 10, 2026 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 153698/2024 Judge: James G. Clynes Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication.

file:///LRB-ALB-FS1/Vol1/ecourts/Process/covers/NYSUP.1536982024.NEW_YORK.002.LBLX000_TO.html[03/19/2026 3:45:54 PM] FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/11/2026 09:48 AM INDEX NO. 153698/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 42 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2026

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. JAMES G. CLYNES PART 39M Justice ------------------X INDEX NO. 153698/2024 STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, MOTION DATE 01/16/2025

Plaintiff, MOTION SEQ. NO. 001

-v- MARIA CHRISTINA CRUZ-CORDERO, MARTHA M. CORDERO ORTEGA, ALL COUNTY, LLC, ARGYLE PHARMACY, INC, ARUNA SUPPLY, INC, ATLANTIC MEDICAL & DIAGNOSTIC, PC, CHIROPRACTIC SPINE & AMENDED SPORT OF QUEENS PC, INNA LEVTSENKO DECISION + ORDER ON PRACTITIONER IN ADULT HEALTH, PC,KIM PHYSICAL MOTION THERAPY, PC,MEDLINE PLUS PHARMACY INC, SENECA AVE ACUPUNCTURE, PC,THERAKINEMATIC PT, PC,WELL-BEING CHIROPRACTIC, PC

Defendant.

------------------X The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 001) 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37 were read on this motion to/for JUDGMENT - DEFAULT

Upon the foregoing documents, Plaintiff's motion for default judgment against Defendants ALL COUNTY, LLC, ARGYLE PHARMACY, INC, ARUNA SUPPLY, INC, ATLANTIC MEDICAL & DIAGNOSTIC, PC, CHIROPRACTIC SPINE & SPORT OF QUEENS PC, INNA LEVTSENKO PRACTITIONER IN ADULT HEALTH, PC, KIM PHYSICAL THERAPY, PC, MEDLINE PLUS PHARMACY INC, SENECA AVE ACUPUNCTURE, · PC,

THERAKINEMATIC PT, PC, WELL-BEING CHIROPRACTIC, PC ("Defaulting Defendants")

is granted without opposition. In this action Plaintiff is seeking default judgment to disclaim No-Fault coverage for breach of a condition precedent to No-Fault coverage by Defendants/Claimants failure to subscribe to and return their respective EUO transcripts, founded belief that the collision was not a covered incident, and no obligation to provide liability coverage for the alleged incident arising out of the July 30, 2023 under SFMAIC claim number 32-53T9-54H. 153698/2024 STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY vs. CRUZ- . Page 1 of4 CORDERO, MARIA CHRISTINA ET AL Motion No. 001

1 of 4 [* 1] FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/11/2026 09:48 AM INDEX NO. 153698/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 42 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2026

On July 30, 2023, Defendant/Claimant MARTHA M. CORDERO ORTEGA was involved in an alleged motor vehicle collision at or near 2870 Hempstead Turnpike, in Nassau County, New

York. A police report stated that there was a collision with an adverse vehicle which fled the scene of the accident. The police report further stated there were no injuries reported at the scene. Shortly afterwards Plaintiff received applications for No-Fault Benefits from Defendants/Claimants

MARIA CHRISTINA CRUZ-CORDERO and MARTHA M. CORDERO ORTEGA. Both

Defendants reported to have sustained significant bodily injuries in the collision.

11 NYCRR 65-1.1 requires that a No-Fault claimant fully comply with the terms of

coverage in a No-Fault policy as a condition precedent to all claims against an insurer under that policy. A claimant's failure to subscribe to and return an EUO transcript constitutes a breach of a

condition precedent to coverage under the applicable No-Fault regulations and warrants denial of claims submitted pursuant to a policy regulated thereunder (Kemper Independence Ins. Co. v

Cornerstone Chiropractic, P.C., 185 AD3d 468 [1st Dept 2020]. Plaintiff found these claims questionable and exercised its rights under the No-Fault regulations to request examinations under oath ("EUOs") of Defendants to determine the

legitimacy of the loss and necessity of any alleged treatment. Defendants appeared at their

respective EUOs. However, Plaintiff found their testimony questionable, namely Defendant MARIA CHRISTINA CRUZ-CORDERO was not listed on the police accident report but began

treating for injuries she allegedly sustained in the collision, Plaintiff spoke with the responding

officer after the collision who stated Defendant MARTHA M. CORDERO ORTEGA was alone

in the insured vehicle, the adverse vehicles insurance company advised that their investigation

revealed only one person was in the insured vehicle at the time of the loss, inter alia. Following

each Defendants EUO, Plaintiff forwarded copies of their EUO transcripts for execution to be returned to Plaintiff; neither Defendant did so. An insurer may assert a lack of coverage defense based on the fact or founded belief that a claimant's alleged injury did not arise out of a covered incident (Cent. Gen. Hosp. v Chubb Group ofIns. Cos., 90 NY2d 195,201 [1997]). In demonstrating the facts supporting its founded belief,

153698/2024 STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY vs. CRUZ- Page 2of4 CORDERO, MARIA CHRISTINA ET AL Motion No. 001

2 of 4 [* 2] FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/11/2026 09:48 AM INDEX NO. 153698/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 42 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2026

an insurer may present circumstantial evidence to prove such facts, provided that a reasonable inference can be drawn from them (Benzaken v Verizon Communications, Inc., 21 AD3d 864, 865

[2d Dept 2005], quoting Staples v Sisson, 274 AD2d 779, 781 [3d Dept 2000]). A defaulting

defendant is deemed to have admitted the allegations in a plaintiffs complaint by its failure to

answer (State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v Surgicore ofJersey City, 195 AD3d 454,455 [1st Dept 2021])

Here, Defendants MARIA CHRISTINA CRUZ-CORDERO and MARTHA M. CORDERO ORTEGA defaulted by failing to submit an answer and are deemed to have admitted

the allegations in Plaintiffs complaint.

Plaintiff later stipulated with Defendants MARIA CHRISTINA CRUZ-CORDERO and

MARTHA M. CORDERO ORTEGA whereby Defendants waived any claims they have asserted

or might ever assert for the July 30, 2023, collision under claim number 32-53T9-53H. In return

Plaintiff discontinued the action with prejudice against both MARIA CHRISTINA CRUZ-

CORDERO and MARTHA M. CORDERO ORTEGA (NYSCEF Doc. Nos. 16, 17, and 22).

A plaintiff moving for default judgment must establish proper service on defendant; defendant's default; and the facts constituting plaintiffs claims. (CPLR 3215 [fJ.) Plaintiff has

shown that it properly served the Defaulting Defendants and none of the Defaulting Defendants appeared in this action. Plaintiff has sufficiently proven the facts constituting its claim for default-

judgment through the affidavit of Zachary Whiting and Susan Marcello and the documents

attached to the affidavit, including copies of the EUO transcripts, police report, and stipulations.

The motion is granted without opposition. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the Plaintiff's motion for default judgment based on breach of a condition

precedent to No-Fault coverage is granted against Defendants ALL COUNTY, LLC, ARGYLE PHARMACY, INC, ARUNA SUPPLY, INC, ATLANTIC MEDICAL & DIAGNOSTIC, PC, CHIROPRACTIC SPINE & SPORT OF QUEENS PC, INNA LEVTSENKO PRACTITIONER IN ADULT HEALTH, PC, KIM PHYSICAL THERAPY, PC, MEDLINE PLUS PHARMACY INC, SENECA AVE ACUPUNCTURE, PC, THERAKINEMATIC PT, PC, WELL-BEING

153698/2024 STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY vs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Central General Hospital v. Chubb Group of Insurance Companies
681 N.E.2d 413 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)
Kemper Independence Ins. Co. v. Cornerstone Chiropractic, P.C.
2020 NY Slip Op 3876 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Benzaken v. Verizon Communications, Inc.
21 A.D.3d 864 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Staples v. Sisson
274 A.D.2d 779 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2026 NY Slip Op 30890(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-farm-mut-auto-ins-co-v-cruz-cordero-nysupctnewyork-2026.