State Farm Life Insurance Company v. Arnold
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
STATE FARM LIFE INSURANCE ) COMPANY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. 22-cv-2834-SMY vs. ) ) LORETTA L. ARNOLD, ) MICHAEL L. STANLEY, and ) VERNA GAYLE DRYSDALE STANLEY, ) ) Defendants. )
ORDER FOR DISTRIBUTION
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Agreed Motion for Distribution (Doc. 59), and the Court having considered the same, GRANTS the Motion and ORDERS as follows: 1. The Clerk of Court shall disburse the funds currently on deposit with the Treasury Registry of the Clerk’s Office in the amount of $98,532.18 to Crain, Miller & Wernsman, Ltd. 2. This proceeding in its entirety is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; the Clerk of Court shall and close this case. The parties request that the Court retain jurisdiction over this matter for purposes of construing, implementing, and enforcing the agreement, should that be required. However, unless it is substantially incorporated in a Consent Decree or Judgment, a settlement agreement is a contract which may be enforced through a breach of contract action. Deputy v. McEwen, 495 F.3d 807, 809 (7th Cir. 2007), Shapo v. Engle, 463 F.3d 641, 643 (7th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, the Court declines to retain jurisdiction of this matter to enforce the parties’ settlement. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: September 23, 2024 Cle STACI M. YANDLE United States District Judge
Page 2 of 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State Farm Life Insurance Company v. Arnold (State Farm Life Insurance Company v. Arnold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.