State Farm Insurance v. Jackson
106 A.D.2d 508, 483 N.Y.S.2d 41, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21540
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 17, 1984·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kassoff, J.), dated July 13, 1983, which, after a hearing, inter alia, granted the application.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
The finding that there had been no contact between appellant’s vehicle and a “hit-and-run” vehicle was based on a fair interpretation of the evidence presented at the hearing (Matter of Poggemeyer, 87 AD2d 822, 823). Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State Farm Insurance v. Jackson, 106 A.D.2d 508, 483 N.Y.S.2d 41, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21540 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).
106 A.D.2d 508 (State Farm Insurance v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. McMillan
288 A.D.2d 224 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Bermudez
111 A.D.2d 858 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)