State Farm Insurance v. Adorno

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

State Farm Insurance v. Adorno

307 A.D.2d 322, 762 N.Y.S.2d 526

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 21, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 307 A.D.2d 322 (State Farm Insurance v. Adorno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Farm Insurance v. Adorno, 307 A.D.2d 322, 762 N.Y.S.2d 526 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration of a claim for uninsured motor vehicle benefits, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Silverman, J.H.O.), dated July 25, 2001, which, upon a hearing on the issue of fraud, inter alia, in effect, denied the petition, and directed the petitioner to proceed to arbitration.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court correctly determined that the petitioner did not prove its claim of fraud.

The parties’ remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Florio, J.P., Friedmann, Townes and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration of a claim for uninsured motor vehicle benefits, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Silverman, J.H.O.), dated July 25, 2001, which, upon a hearing on the issue of fraud, inter alia, in effect, denied the petition, and directed the petitioner to proceed to arbitration.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court correctly determined that the petitioner did not prove its claim of fraud.

The parties’ remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Florio, J.P., Friedmann, Townes and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

307 A.D.2d 322, 762 N.Y.S.2d 526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-farm-insurance-v-adorno-nyappdiv-2003.