State Farm Florida Insurance Co. v. Mix

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State Farm Florida Insurance Co. v. Mix

928 So. 2d 488, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6902, 2006 WL 1210316

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 8, 2006

DocketNo. 1D06-0645

StatusPublished

This text of 928 So. 2d 488 (State Farm Florida Insurance Co. v. Mix) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Farm Florida Insurance Co. v. Mix, 928 So. 2d 488, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6902, 2006 WL 1210316 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellant’s response to this Court’s order of February 23, 2006, the Court has determined 'that the order on appeal is not an appealable partial final judgment. Specifically, any additional claim or claims based on “other coverages under the policy,” which remain pending in the lower tribunal at this time, and which arise out of the same contract for insurance and from the same incident causing loss are necessarily related to the claim applying the Valued Policy Law, Section 627.702, Florida Statutes, to the contract. See generally Mierzwa v. Florida Windstorm Underwriting Ass’n, 877 So.2d 774, 779 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (noting that the resolution of an Ordinance or Law Coverage claim under a windstorm insurance policy is related to the decision on the Valued Policy Law issue). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

ERVIN, VAN NORTWICK, and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellant’s response to this Court’s order of February 23, 2006, the Court has determined 'that the order on appeal is not an appealable partial final judgment. Specifically, any additional claim or claims based on “other coverages under the policy,” which remain pending in the lower tribunal at this time, and which arise out of the same contract for insurance and from the same incident causing loss are necessarily related to the claim applying the Valued Policy Law, Section 627.702, Florida Statutes, to the contract. See generally Mierzwa v. Florida Windstorm Underwriting Ass’n, 877 So.2d 774, 779 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (noting that the resolution of an Ordinance or Law Coverage claim under a windstorm insurance policy is related to the decision on the Valued Policy Law issue). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

ERVIN, VAN NORTWICK, and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

928 So. 2d 488, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6902, 2006 WL 1210316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-farm-florida-insurance-co-v-mix-fladistctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack