State Farm Fire & Casualty v. Parking System Valet Service

63 A.D.3d 1139, 881 N.Y.S.2d 308
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 30, 2009·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In a subrogation action to recover insurance benefits paid to the plaintiffs insured for the theft of personal property, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Geller, J.H.O.), entered September 29, 2008, which, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the plaintiff and against it.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Based on the evidence at trial, the Supreme Court properly found in favor of the plaintiff on the issue of liability. Mastro, J.P, Fisher, Eng and Hall, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Farm Fire & Casualty v. Parking System Valet Service, 63 A.D.3d 1139, 881 N.Y.S.2d 308 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

63 A.D.3d 1139 (State Farm Fire & Casualty v. Parking System Valet Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Farm Fire & Casualty v. Parking Systems Valet Service
85 A.D.3d 761 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)