State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Painter

402 So. 2d 61, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20738
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 12, 1981
DocketNo. 79-1627
StatusPublished

This text of 402 So. 2d 61 (State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Painter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Painter, 402 So. 2d 61, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20738 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s order granting the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial is affirmed. See, Cloud v. Fallis, 110 So.2d 669 (Fla.1959); Weems v. Dawson, 352 So.2d 1196 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). Although none of the parties, nor the trial court in its order granting a new trial, has directed our attention to the verdict in this cause, our decision is bolstered by its inconsistency. In its verdict the jury found for the plaintiffs and against no one of the defendants. It then determined the plaintiffs’ damages to be zero. At the new trial a proper form of verdict should be utilized.

AFFIRMED.

MOORE, GLICKSTEIN and HURLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cloud v. Fallis
110 So. 2d 669 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1959)
Weems v. Dawson
352 So. 2d 1196 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
402 So. 2d 61, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-farm-fire-casualty-co-v-painter-fladistctapp-1981.