State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Levine

791 So. 2d 591, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11450, 2001 WL 912822
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 15, 2001·No. 3D00-1861·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

791 So.2d 591 (2001)

STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
Susan LEVINE, Appellee.

No. 3D00-1861.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

August 15, 2001.

Clark, Robb, Mason & Coulombe and James K. Clark, for appellant.

Holland & Knight and Christopher N. Bellows and Daniel S. Pearson, Miami, for appellee.

Before JORGENSON, GODERICH, and SHEVIN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant below appeals from a final judgment entered after a jury verdict for the plaintiff. We affirm due to State Farm's lack of due diligence in investigating juror nondisclosure. See De La Rosa v. Zequeira, 659 So.2d 239 (Fla.1995); Tejada v. Roberts, 760 So.2d 960 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), review granted, No. SC00-1080, 786 So.2d 1188 (Fla. Nov. 13, 2000). The minimal efforts made to obtain evidence of a nondisclosure came too late. See Tejada, 760 So.2d at 966.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Levine, 791 So. 2d 591, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11450, 2001 WL 912822 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

791 So. 2d 591 (State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Levine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. v. Levine
875 So. 2d 663 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. v. Levine
837 So. 2d 363 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)
Mills v. State
791 So. 2d 591 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)