State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Goldstein

674 So. 2d 880, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5492, 1996 WL 279798
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 29, 1996
DocketNo. 95-3101
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 674 So. 2d 880 (State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Goldstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Goldstein, 674 So. 2d 880, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5492, 1996 WL 279798 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

Because the windstorm coverage of the State Farm homeowner’s policy in question clearly did not protect trees and shrubbery,1 [881]*881and the only protection for trees and shrubbery clearly did not include damage from windstorm,2 it follows, as a matter of pure logic, that the trial court erred in holding that there was coverage for damage to the appellees’ trees and shrubbery caused by the ultimate windstorm, Hurricane Andrew.

Accordingly, the cause is reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and LEVY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
674 So. 2d 880, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5492, 1996 WL 279798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-farm-fire-casualty-co-v-goldstein-fladistctapp-1996.