State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Goldstein

674 So. 2d 880, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5492, 1996 WL 279798
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 29, 1996·No. No. 95-3101·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

Because the windstorm coverage of the State Farm homeowner’s policy in question clearly did not protect trees and shrubbery,1 [881]*881and the only protection for trees and shrubbery clearly did not include damage from windstorm,2 it follows, as a matter of pure logic, that the trial court erred in holding that there was coverage for damage to the appellees’ trees and shrubbery caused by the ultimate windstorm, Hurricane Andrew.

Accordingly, the cause is reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and LEVY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Goldstein, 674 So. 2d 880, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5492, 1996 WL 279798 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

674 So. 2d 880 (State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Goldstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related