State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v Active Care Chiro & Natural Wellness Ctr. 2025 NY Slip Op 31144(U) April 7, 2025 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 159861/2023 Judge: Lyle E. Frank Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. INDEX NO. 159861/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 108 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/07/2025
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. LYLE E. FRANK PART 11M Justice ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X INDEX NO. 159861/2023 STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, MOTION DATE 12/17/2024 Plaintiff, MOTION SEQ. NO. 002 -v- ACTIVE CARE CHIRO & NATURAL WELLNESS CENTER, ARD RX INC.,ARISTA PHYSICAL THERAPY P.C.,AUTO RX, BORUKHOV RADIOLOGY, PLLC D/B/A HIGHLINE RADIOLOGY, ELIYAHU'S PHARMACY INC.,EM MEDICAL SUPPLIES, CORP, FLATLANDS VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE AND FIRST AID CORPS, INC.,FRIENDLY RX, INC.,GOLD COAST MEDICAL CARE, PLLC,HOLLIS DRUGS, INC.,IRINA MEDICAL SUPPLIES, INC.,JANAN SAYYED, D.C., P.C.,MAXX SUPPLY CORP., MDCA DECISION + ORDER ON PSYCHOLOGY CARE, P.C.,MEDICAL SUPPLY OF NY SERVICES INC.,NOURSEEN P.T. P.C.,ONE TOUCH MOTION HEALTH SUPPLY, INC.,ORTHOCORE SUPPLY, INC.,PEOPLE'S CHOICE PHARMACY NY CORP, RED MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC.,REHAB TIME PT, P.C.,S AND C CHIROPRACTIC, P.C.,S & K WARBASSE PHARMACY INC.,SPRING VALLEY MEDICAL CARE P.C.,WALMED EQUIPMENT LLC,NASIR WINDLEY, IMANI RICHARDSON, SHAWN LAWSON
Defendant. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 002) 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 105, 107 were read on this motion to/for JUDGMENT - SUMMARY .
Upon the foregoing documents, plaintiff’s motion is granted in part and denied in part.
Background
On October 2, 2022, Nasir Windley (“Windley”), Shawn Lawson (“Lawson”), and Imani
Richardson (“Richardson”) were allegedly involved in a motor vehicle collision (the
“Accident”). Multiple bills from medical providers were submitted to State Farm Fire and
Casualty Company (“Plaintiff”) as a result. Plaintiff investigated the incident and as a result
believes that there is a “strong possibility that the collision was an intentional act or that the 159861/2023 STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY vs. ACTIVE CARE CHIRO & Page 1 of 5 NATURAL WELLNESS CENTER ET AL Motion No. 002
1 of 5 [* 1] INDEX NO. 159861/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 108 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/07/2025
alleged injuries of the Claimants did not arise from an insured incident.” During the process of
the investigation, Windley failed to appear for his EUOs on two or more occasions, Richardson
left in the middle of an EUO and allegedly did not return for another one nor return her
subscribed copy of the transcript, and Lawson appeared for his EUO but did not return a
subscribed copy of the transcript. In an arbitration hearing on behalf of an assignee of Lawson,
the arbitrator held that Plaintiff had not established that the Accident was fraudulent. This
holding was affirmed in another arbitration between some of the parties in this case.
Plaintiff brought the underlying proceeding in October of 2023, seeking declaratory
judgments that it owes no duty to pay the No-Fault benefits and claims of the defendants in
relation to the Accident. In the present motion, Plaintiff seeks summary judgment against EM
Medical Supplies Corp., Maxx Supply Corp., Nourseen P.T. P.C., People’s Choice Pharmacy
NY Corp., Rehab Time PT. P.C., S and C Chiropractic P.C., and Walmed Equipment LLC.
(collectively, the “Appearing Defendants”). E.M. Medical Supplies Corp., Maxx Supply Corp.,
People’s Choice Pharmacy NY Corp., and Walmed Equipment LLC (collectively, the “Javakov
Defendants”) have opposed the motion.
Standard of Review
Under CPLR § 3212, a party may move for summary judgment and the motion “shall be
granted if, upon all the papers and proof submitted, the cause of action or defense shall be
established sufficiently to warrant the court as a matter of law in directing judgment in favor of
any party.” CPLR § 3212(b). Once the movant makes a showing of a prima facie entitlement to
judgment as a matter of law, the burden then shifts to the opponent to “produce evidentiary proof
in admissible form sufficient to establish the existence of material issues of fact which require a
trial of the action.” Stonehill Capital Mgt. LLC v. Bank of the W., 28 N.Y.3d 439, 448 (2016).
159861/2023 STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY vs. ACTIVE CARE CHIRO & Page 2 of 5 NATURAL WELLNESS CENTER ET AL Motion No. 002
2 of 5 [* 2] INDEX NO. 159861/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 108 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/07/2025
The facts must be viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, but conclusory
statements are insufficient to defeat summary judgment. Id.
Discussion
Plaintiff argues that they are entitled to summary judgment on a fraud theory and that the
respective alleged failures by the individuals involved in the Accident regarding the EUO
process bars their claims. The Javakov Defendants oppose the motion for three reasons: 1) the
fraud defense is collaterally estopped; 2) there is no evidentiary proof of Richardson’s failure to
return for an EUO; and 3) the failure to return subscribed EUO transcripts is not a valid No-Fault
defense. For the reasons that follow, plaintiff’s motion is granted as to claims for the treatment of
Nasir Windley and Imani Richardson and denied as to claims for the treatment of Shawn
Lawson.
Collateral Estoppel Does Not Fully Bar This Motion
The Javakov Defendants argue that Plaintiff is estopped from summary judgment on the
grounds of fraud due to the previous arbitration hearings. Plaintiff argues that there is not an
identity of parties or issues between the hearings and this case. In New York, “prior arbitration
awards may be given preclusive effect in a subsequent judicial action.” Bernard v. Proskauer
Rose, LLP, 87 A.D.3d 412, 415 (1st Dept. 2011). The identity of the parties requirement means
that “both actions must involve the same parties or their privies.” Rojas v. Romanoff, 186 A.D.3d
103, 109 (1st Dept. 2020). Whether or not the Javakov Defendants can all be said to have privity
with the parties in the two arbitration awards, the result of those hearings clearly raise an issue of
fact that would bar summary judgment on that basis. But here Plaintiff advances other theories of
why they do not have to provide No-Fault coverage for the Accident, which were not addressed
at arbitration. Therefore, the previous arbitrations do not fully bar this motion.
159861/2023 STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY vs. ACTIVE CARE CHIRO & Page 3 of 5 NATURAL WELLNESS CENTER ET AL Motion No. 002
3 of 5 [* 3] INDEX NO. 159861/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 108 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/07/2025
Failure to Appear for EUOs
Plaintiff also argues that they do not have No-Fault obligations here because Richardson
failed to complete her duly scheduled EUOs and Windley failed to appear for his duly scheduled
EUO. The Javakov Defendants do not contest the failure to appear by Windley. They argue that
the only evidence that Richardson failed to return to complete her EUOs is inadmissible and
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v Active Care Chiro & Natural Wellness Ctr. 2025 NY Slip Op 31144(U) April 7, 2025 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 159861/2023 Judge: Lyle E. Frank Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. INDEX NO. 159861/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 108 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/07/2025
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. LYLE E. FRANK PART 11M Justice ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X INDEX NO. 159861/2023 STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, MOTION DATE 12/17/2024 Plaintiff, MOTION SEQ. NO. 002 -v- ACTIVE CARE CHIRO & NATURAL WELLNESS CENTER, ARD RX INC.,ARISTA PHYSICAL THERAPY P.C.,AUTO RX, BORUKHOV RADIOLOGY, PLLC D/B/A HIGHLINE RADIOLOGY, ELIYAHU'S PHARMACY INC.,EM MEDICAL SUPPLIES, CORP, FLATLANDS VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE AND FIRST AID CORPS, INC.,FRIENDLY RX, INC.,GOLD COAST MEDICAL CARE, PLLC,HOLLIS DRUGS, INC.,IRINA MEDICAL SUPPLIES, INC.,JANAN SAYYED, D.C., P.C.,MAXX SUPPLY CORP., MDCA DECISION + ORDER ON PSYCHOLOGY CARE, P.C.,MEDICAL SUPPLY OF NY SERVICES INC.,NOURSEEN P.T. P.C.,ONE TOUCH MOTION HEALTH SUPPLY, INC.,ORTHOCORE SUPPLY, INC.,PEOPLE'S CHOICE PHARMACY NY CORP, RED MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC.,REHAB TIME PT, P.C.,S AND C CHIROPRACTIC, P.C.,S & K WARBASSE PHARMACY INC.,SPRING VALLEY MEDICAL CARE P.C.,WALMED EQUIPMENT LLC,NASIR WINDLEY, IMANI RICHARDSON, SHAWN LAWSON
Defendant. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 002) 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 105, 107 were read on this motion to/for JUDGMENT - SUMMARY .
Upon the foregoing documents, plaintiff’s motion is granted in part and denied in part.
Background
On October 2, 2022, Nasir Windley (“Windley”), Shawn Lawson (“Lawson”), and Imani
Richardson (“Richardson”) were allegedly involved in a motor vehicle collision (the
“Accident”). Multiple bills from medical providers were submitted to State Farm Fire and
Casualty Company (“Plaintiff”) as a result. Plaintiff investigated the incident and as a result
believes that there is a “strong possibility that the collision was an intentional act or that the 159861/2023 STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY vs. ACTIVE CARE CHIRO & Page 1 of 5 NATURAL WELLNESS CENTER ET AL Motion No. 002
1 of 5 [* 1] INDEX NO. 159861/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 108 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/07/2025
alleged injuries of the Claimants did not arise from an insured incident.” During the process of
the investigation, Windley failed to appear for his EUOs on two or more occasions, Richardson
left in the middle of an EUO and allegedly did not return for another one nor return her
subscribed copy of the transcript, and Lawson appeared for his EUO but did not return a
subscribed copy of the transcript. In an arbitration hearing on behalf of an assignee of Lawson,
the arbitrator held that Plaintiff had not established that the Accident was fraudulent. This
holding was affirmed in another arbitration between some of the parties in this case.
Plaintiff brought the underlying proceeding in October of 2023, seeking declaratory
judgments that it owes no duty to pay the No-Fault benefits and claims of the defendants in
relation to the Accident. In the present motion, Plaintiff seeks summary judgment against EM
Medical Supplies Corp., Maxx Supply Corp., Nourseen P.T. P.C., People’s Choice Pharmacy
NY Corp., Rehab Time PT. P.C., S and C Chiropractic P.C., and Walmed Equipment LLC.
(collectively, the “Appearing Defendants”). E.M. Medical Supplies Corp., Maxx Supply Corp.,
People’s Choice Pharmacy NY Corp., and Walmed Equipment LLC (collectively, the “Javakov
Defendants”) have opposed the motion.
Standard of Review
Under CPLR § 3212, a party may move for summary judgment and the motion “shall be
granted if, upon all the papers and proof submitted, the cause of action or defense shall be
established sufficiently to warrant the court as a matter of law in directing judgment in favor of
any party.” CPLR § 3212(b). Once the movant makes a showing of a prima facie entitlement to
judgment as a matter of law, the burden then shifts to the opponent to “produce evidentiary proof
in admissible form sufficient to establish the existence of material issues of fact which require a
trial of the action.” Stonehill Capital Mgt. LLC v. Bank of the W., 28 N.Y.3d 439, 448 (2016).
159861/2023 STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY vs. ACTIVE CARE CHIRO & Page 2 of 5 NATURAL WELLNESS CENTER ET AL Motion No. 002
2 of 5 [* 2] INDEX NO. 159861/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 108 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/07/2025
The facts must be viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, but conclusory
statements are insufficient to defeat summary judgment. Id.
Discussion
Plaintiff argues that they are entitled to summary judgment on a fraud theory and that the
respective alleged failures by the individuals involved in the Accident regarding the EUO
process bars their claims. The Javakov Defendants oppose the motion for three reasons: 1) the
fraud defense is collaterally estopped; 2) there is no evidentiary proof of Richardson’s failure to
return for an EUO; and 3) the failure to return subscribed EUO transcripts is not a valid No-Fault
defense. For the reasons that follow, plaintiff’s motion is granted as to claims for the treatment of
Nasir Windley and Imani Richardson and denied as to claims for the treatment of Shawn
Lawson.
Collateral Estoppel Does Not Fully Bar This Motion
The Javakov Defendants argue that Plaintiff is estopped from summary judgment on the
grounds of fraud due to the previous arbitration hearings. Plaintiff argues that there is not an
identity of parties or issues between the hearings and this case. In New York, “prior arbitration
awards may be given preclusive effect in a subsequent judicial action.” Bernard v. Proskauer
Rose, LLP, 87 A.D.3d 412, 415 (1st Dept. 2011). The identity of the parties requirement means
that “both actions must involve the same parties or their privies.” Rojas v. Romanoff, 186 A.D.3d
103, 109 (1st Dept. 2020). Whether or not the Javakov Defendants can all be said to have privity
with the parties in the two arbitration awards, the result of those hearings clearly raise an issue of
fact that would bar summary judgment on that basis. But here Plaintiff advances other theories of
why they do not have to provide No-Fault coverage for the Accident, which were not addressed
at arbitration. Therefore, the previous arbitrations do not fully bar this motion.
159861/2023 STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY vs. ACTIVE CARE CHIRO & Page 3 of 5 NATURAL WELLNESS CENTER ET AL Motion No. 002
3 of 5 [* 3] INDEX NO. 159861/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 108 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/07/2025
Failure to Appear for EUOs
Plaintiff also argues that they do not have No-Fault obligations here because Richardson
failed to complete her duly scheduled EUOs and Windley failed to appear for his duly scheduled
EUO. The Javakov Defendants do not contest the failure to appear by Windley. They argue that
the only evidence that Richardson failed to return to complete her EUOs is inadmissible and
therefore Plaintiff has failed to meet their burden as to her on this theory. Appearance at a duly
scheduled EUO is a condition precedent to No-Fault coverage. Unitrin Advantage Ins. Co. v.
Bayshore Physical Therapy, PLLC, 82 A.D.3d 559, 560 (1st Dept. 2011). Furthermore, in the
First Department a plaintiff may establish that a party failed to appear to an EUO by submitting
transcripts of the EUOs. See State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. AK Global Supply Corp., 203
A.D.3d 556, 557 (1st Dept. 2022); see also American States Ins. Co. v. Huff, 119 A.D.3d 478,
479 (1st Dept. 2014). Therefore, Plaintiff has established their burden as relates to Windley and
Richardson.
Failure to Return EUO Transcripts
Plaintiff seeks summary judgment as relates to the claims by Lawson on the grounds that
he failed to return subscribed EUO transcripts. A failure by a claimant to return a subscribed
transcript is a violation of a condition precedent to coverage. Hertz Vehicles, LLC v. Gejo, LLC,
161 A.D.3d 549, 549 (1st Dept. 2018). Here, however, the request for a return of the subscribed
transcript was only sent to Lawson’s counsel, not the claimant himself. Under these
circumstances, the Court cannot determine that Plaintiff has met their burden on a summary
judgment motion as to claims by Lawson. Accordingly, it is hereby
ADJUDGED that plaintiff’s motion is granted in part and denied in part; and it is further
159861/2023 STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY vs. ACTIVE CARE CHIRO & Page 4 of 5 NATURAL WELLNESS CENTER ET AL Motion No. 002
4 of 5 [* 4] INDEX NO. 159861/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 108 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/07/2025
ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECLARED that plaintiff has no duty to pay any No-
Fault benefits in the form of sums, monies, damages, awards or benefits to defendants EM
Medical Supplies Corp., Maxx Supply Corp., Nourseen P.T. P.C., People’s Choice Pharmacy
NY Corp., Rehab Time PT. P.C., S and C Chiropractic P.C., and Walmed Equipment LLC, their
agents, employees, assignees or heirs arising out of any current or future proceeding, including
without limitation, arbitrations and lawsuits seeking to recover No-Fault benefits with respect to
claims on behalf of Nasir Windley and Imani Richardson regarding the collision that occurred on
October 2, 2022, referenced in the complaint, and reference by claim number 32-40B5-90K; and
it is further
ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECLARED that all No-Fault lawsuits, arbitrations,
awards, and claims filed by defendants EM Medical Supplies Corp., Maxx Supply Corp.,
Nourseen P.T. P.C., People’s Choice Pharmacy NY Corp., Rehab Time PT. P.C., S and C
Chiropractic P.C., and Walmed Equipment LLC, on behalf of Nasir Windley and Imani
Richardson regarding the October 2, 2022 collision referenced in the complaint, and referenced
by claim number 32-40B5-90K are hereby stayed; and it is further
ADJUDGED that this order does not impact claims filed on behalf of Shawn Lawson
regarding the October 2, 2022, collision referenced in the complaint under the claim number 32-
40B5-90K.
4/7/2025 DATE LYLE E. FRANK, J.S.C. CHECK ONE: CASE DISPOSED X NON-FINAL DISPOSITION
GRANTED DENIED X GRANTED IN PART OTHER
APPLICATION: SETTLE ORDER SUBMIT ORDER
CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT REFERENCE
159861/2023 STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY vs. ACTIVE CARE CHIRO & Page 5 of 5 NATURAL WELLNESS CENTER ET AL Motion No. 002
5 of 5 [* 5]