State ex rel. Zimmerman v. Chapman

Indiana Court of Appeals

State ex rel. Zimmerman v. Chapman

58 N.E. 1096, 26 Ind. App. 694, 1900 Ind. App. LEXIS 43

CourtIndiana Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 20, 1900

DocketNo. 3,313

StatusPublished

This text of 58 N.E. 1096 (State ex rel. Zimmerman v. Chapman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Zimmerman v. Chapman, 58 N.E. 1096, 26 Ind. App. 694, 1900 Ind. App. LEXIS 43 (Ind. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Comstock, J.

This is an action against a township trustee and his sureties to recover for alleged breaches of the official bond of the trustee. The complaint charges that the relators are the good-faith holders by assignment indorsed thereon of a warrant which had been wrongfully issued by the trustee.

The only question presented is the sufficiency of the complaint. This question was passed upon in State v. Hawes, 112 Ind. 323, and Grimsley v. State, 116 Ind. 130, adversely to appellants. The authorities are not in accord upon the questions involved, but the above decisions preclude further discussion by this court.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Comstock, J.

This is an action against a township trustee and his sureties to recover for alleged breaches of the official bond of the trustee. The complaint charges that the relators are the good-faith holders by assignment indorsed thereon of a warrant which had been wrongfully issued by the trustee.

The only question presented is the sufficiency of the complaint. This question was passed upon in State v. Hawes, 112 Ind. 323, and Grimsley v. State, 116 Ind. 130, adversely to appellants. The authorities are not in accord upon the questions involved, but the above decisions preclude further discussion by this court.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 N.E. 1096, 26 Ind. App. 694, 1900 Ind. App. LEXIS 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-zimmerman-v-chapman-indctapp-1900.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack