State ex rel. Zeigler v. Koher
This text of 937 N.E.2d 1034 (State ex rel. Zeigler v. Koher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In Quo Warranto. Relator’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. Relator’s suggestion for substitution as respondent is recognized. Respondent’s motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied. Sua sponte, an alternative writ is granted, and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 10.6:
The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days of the date of this entry; relator shall file a brief within ten days of the filing of the evidence; respondent shall file a brief within 20 days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within seven days after filing of respondent’s brief.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
937 N.E.2d 1034, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-zeigler-v-koher-ohio-2010.