State ex rel. Youngstown v. Mahoning Cty. Bd. of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Youngstown v. Mahoning Cty. Bd. of Elections

646 N.E.2d 180, 71 Ohio St. 3d 1485, 1995 Ohio LEXIS 3105

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 28, 1995

Docket95-294

StatusPublished

This text of 646 N.E.2d 180 (State ex rel. Youngstown v. Mahoning Cty. Bd. of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Youngstown v. Mahoning Cty. Bd. of Elections, 646 N.E.2d 180, 71 Ohio St. 3d 1485, 1995 Ohio LEXIS 3105 (Ohio 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of an original action involving an expedited election matter. Upon consideration of respondents’ motion to dismiss and the motion of John R. Sweirz for leave to intervene,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for leave to intervene be, and is hereby, denied, effective February 27, 1995.

Wright, J., dissents.

[1486]*1486IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that an alternative writ be, and the same is hereby, granted, and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present on or before March 2, 1995; relator shall file its brief on or before March 6,1995; respondents shall file their brief on or before March 9,1995; and relator shall file its reply brief, if any, on or before March 13, 1995.

Resnick, J., dissents and would grant the motion to dismiss. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would deny the writs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI