State ex rel. Youngstown Hosp. Assn. v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Youngstown Hosp. Assn. v. Indus. Comm.

2000 Ohio 310, 88 Ohio St. 3d 229

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 21, 2000

Docket1999-1130

StatusPublished

This text of 2000 Ohio 310 (State ex rel. Youngstown Hosp. Assn. v. Indus. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Youngstown Hosp. Assn. v. Indus. Comm., 2000 Ohio 310, 88 Ohio St. 3d 229 (Ohio 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 88 Ohio St.3d 229.]

THE STATE EX REL. YOUNGSTOWN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL.; FELLOWS, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Youngstown Hosp. Assn. v. Indus. Comm., 2000-Ohio-310.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 99-1130—Submitted February 8, 2000—Decided March 22, 2000.) APPEAL and CROSS-APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 98AP-733. __________________ Manos, Pappas & Stefanski Co., L.P.A., Leonard J. Pappas and James A. Neff, for appellee and cross-appellant. Green, Haines, Sgambati, Murphy & Macala Co., L.P.A., Ronald E. Slipski and Steven L. Paulson, for appellant and cross-appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., dissents. F.E. SWEENEY, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 88 Ohio St.3d 229.]

THE STATE EX REL. YOUNGSTOWN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL.; FELLOWS, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Youngstown Hosp. Assn. v. Indus. Comm., 2000-Ohio-310.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 99-1130—Submitted February 8, 2000—Decided March 22, 2000.) APPEAL and CROSS-APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 98AP-733. __________________ Manos, Pappas & Stefanski Co., L.P.A., Leonard J. Pappas and James A. Neff, for appellee and cross-appellant. Green, Haines, Sgambati, Murphy & Macala Co., L.P.A., Ronald E. Slipski and Steven L. Paulson, for appellant and cross-appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., dissents. F.E. SWEENEY, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2000 Ohio 310, 88 Ohio St. 3d 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-youngstown-hosp-assn-v-indus-comm-ohio-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack