State ex rel. Young v. Yates

Montana Supreme Court

State ex rel. Young v. Yates

43 P. 923, 17 Mont. 547, 1896 Mont. LEXIS 29

DecidedFebruary 24, 1896

StatusPublished

This text of 43 P. 923 (State ex rel. Young v. Yates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Young v. Yates, 43 P. 923, 17 Mont. 547, 1896 Mont. LEXIS 29 (Mo. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The ease was placed Upon the short cause docket by virtue of a stipulation filed by counsél. The stipulation complied with court rule Vil, subd. la. Counsel stipulated that they would argue • the case in fifteen minutes to the side, and that, in their opinion, the case could be fully and fairly presented in said time. The case was argued February 18, 1896; and, upon consultation after the argument, it appears to the court that a decision of the case involves an extremely important and interesting legal and political question. It is the opinion of the court that the importance of the question as presented is such that it could not be' and, indeed, was not fairly presented on the argument.

It is therefore ordered, under rule VII, subd; le, that the case be reargued, and that it take its regular place upon the calendar.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam.

The ease was placed Upon the short cause docket by virtue of a stipulation filed by counsél. The stipulation complied with court rule Vil, subd. la. Counsel stipulated that they would argue • the case in fifteen minutes to the side, and that, in their opinion, the case could be fully and fairly presented in said time. The case was argued February 18, 1896; and, upon consultation after the argument, it appears to the court that a decision of the case involves an extremely important and interesting legal and political question. It is the opinion of the court that the importance of the question as presented is such that it could not be' and, indeed, was not fairly presented on the argument.

It is therefore ordered, under rule VII, subd; le, that the case be reargued, and that it take its regular place upon the calendar.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 P. 923, 17 Mont. 547, 1896 Mont. LEXIS 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-young-v-yates-mont-1896.