State ex rel. Young v. Montgomery

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Young v. Montgomery

674 N.E.2d 1188, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1551, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 451

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 30, 1997

Docket97-232

StatusPublished

This text of 674 N.E.2d 1188 (State ex rel. Young v. Montgomery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Young v. Montgomery, 674 N.E.2d 1188, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1551, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 451 (Ohio 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

In Quo Warranto. On January 30, 1997, relator filed a complaint for a writ of quo warranto and ancillary relief. Relator’s complaint is not supported by an affidavit of the relator or counsel for the relator specifying the details of the claim as required by Rule X(4) of the Supreme Court Rules of Practice. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that relator’s complaint be, and hereby is, stricken and this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Quo Warranto. On January 30, 1997, relator filed a complaint for a writ of quo warranto and ancillary relief. Relator’s complaint is not supported by an affidavit of the relator or counsel for the relator specifying the details of the claim as required by Rule X(4) of the Supreme Court Rules of Practice. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that relator’s complaint be, and hereby is, stricken and this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

674 N.E.2d 1188, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1551, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-young-v-montgomery-ohio-1997.