State ex rel. Young v. Kelly
66 So. 2d 252, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1399
Opinion
The record has been examined and the only point with which we are concerned is whether or not error was committed in denying appellant bail. The Attorney General agrees that the “proof is' not evident or the presumption great” and being so, defendant is entitled to bail.
It is accordingly ordered that the cause be reversed with directions to fix bail for appearance at the next term of the Circuit Court at $5,000 which amount is suggested by the Attorney General to be approved by the Sheriff of Dade County.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Young v. Kelly, 66 So. 2d 252, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1399 (Fla. 1953).
66 So. 2d 252 (State ex rel. Young v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State ex rel. Freeman v. Kelly
86 So. 2d 166 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1956)
Lee v. Delmar
66 So. 2d 252 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1953)