State ex rel. Young v. Indus. Comm.

1998 Ohio 21, 83 Ohio St. 3d 560
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Young v. Indus. Comm.. Read the opinion of the Court — 79 Ohio St. 3d 484
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 10, 1998·No. 1997-1583·Published

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 560.]

THE STATE EX REL. YOUNG, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Young v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-21.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment reversed and cause returned for State ex rel. Noll relief. (No. 97-1583—Submitted August 19, 1998—Decided November 10, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 96APD10-1318. __________________ Law Office of Thomas Tootle and Thomas Tootle, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Craigg E. Gould, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is returned to the Industrial Commission for relief pursuant to State ex rel. Noll v. Indus. Comm. (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 203, 567 N.E.2d 245. DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur. MOYER, C.J., COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent. __________________ LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I dissent and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., and COOK, J., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Young v. Indus. Comm., 1998 Ohio 21, 83 Ohio St. 3d 560 (Ohio 1998).

1998 Ohio 21 (State ex rel. Young v. Indus. Comm.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Noll v. Industrial Commission
567 N.E.2d 245 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1991)
State ex rel. Young v. Industrial Commission
700 N.E.2d 1287 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)