State ex rel. Young v. Hawes
Opinion
Mandamus for $975, for salary as captain, from October 17, 1895, to May 1, 1896. Peremptory writ was awarded as prayed and defendants appealed.
Relator was appointed a patrolman December 5, 1878, was promoted to sergeant March 4, 1884, was promoted to captain, December 2, 1889, and served as captain until dropped from the rolls on-October 17, 1895. His claim is that his appointment as captain on December 2, 1889, was for a term of four years, and at the end of that term, as he was not discharged, he was reappointed, by implication, for another term of four years. He is in error as to both premises. As captain he had no fixed term, and there is no such thing in this State as a reappointment by implication at or after the expiration of a fixed term. [State ex rel. Rife v. Hawes, reported at page 360 of this volume.] The judgment of the circuit court is erroneous, and it is reversed and the writ quashed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
76 S.W. 1108 (State ex rel. Young v. Hawes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.