State ex rel. Young v. Criminal District Court, Sec. G

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Young v. Criminal District Court, Sec. G

592 So. 2d 399, 1992 La. LEXIS 240, 1992 WL 16671

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 29, 1992

DocketNo. 92-KH-0217

StatusPublished

This text of 592 So. 2d 399 (State ex rel. Young v. Criminal District Court, Sec. G) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Young v. Criminal District Court, Sec. G, 592 So. 2d 399, 1992 La. LEXIS 240, 1992 WL 16671 (La. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Young, Wilbert; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial [400]*400writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”, No. 265-917.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application for post conviction relief and motion for extension of time he has filed via certified mail on or about September 9, 1991. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file, and act upon the relator’s application which is herewith transferred to the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Young, Wilbert; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial [400]*400writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”, No. 265-917.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application for post conviction relief and motion for extension of time he has filed via certified mail on or about September 9, 1991. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file, and act upon the relator’s application which is herewith transferred to the district court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

592 So. 2d 399, 1992 La. LEXIS 240, 1992 WL 16671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-young-v-criminal-district-court-sec-g-la-1992.