State ex rel. Young v. Bennett

73 S.W. 1134, 101 Mo. App. 224, 1903 Mo. App. LEXIS 382
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 31, 1903
StatusPublished

This text of 73 S.W. 1134 (State ex rel. Young v. Bennett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Young v. Bennett, 73 S.W. 1134, 101 Mo. App. 224, 1903 Mo. App. LEXIS 382 (Mo. Ct. App. 1903).

Opinion

REYBURN, J.

With unimportant differences in minor details, this case presents the same questions as those passed upon in State ex rel. J. J. Cope et al. v. H. A. Bennett et al., etc., 102 Mo. App. 247, and, in fact, both cases were argued and submitted at the same time. For the reasons therein given the order of the county court granting to Peter Brock and S. D. Hendricks a dramshop license was without authority in law and void, and the judgment of the circuit court annulling the order of the county court in granting such license is hereby affirmed.

Bland, P. J., and Goode, J.f concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Cope v. Bennett
73 S.W. 737 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 S.W. 1134, 101 Mo. App. 224, 1903 Mo. App. LEXIS 382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-young-v-bennett-moctapp-1903.