State ex rel. Young v. Bennett

73 S.W. 1134, 101 Mo. App. 224, 1903 Mo. App. LEXIS 382
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 31, 1903·Published

Opinion

REYBURN, J.

With unimportant differences in minor details, this case presents the same questions as those passed upon in State ex rel. J. J. Cope et al. v. H. A. Bennett et al., etc., 102 Mo. App. 247, and, in fact, both cases were argued and submitted at the same time. For the reasons therein given the order of the county court granting to Peter Brock and S. D. Hendricks a dramshop license was without authority in law and void, and the judgment of the circuit court annulling the order of the county court in granting such license is hereby affirmed.

Bland, P. J., and Goode, J.f concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Young v. Bennett, 73 S.W. 1134, 101 Mo. App. 224, 1903 Mo. App. LEXIS 382 (Mo. Ct. App. 1903).

73 S.W. 1134 (State ex rel. Young v. Bennett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Cope v. Bennett
73 S.W. 737 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1903)