State ex rel. York v. Indus. Comm.

2000 Ohio 18, 90 Ohio St. 3d 70

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 90 Ohio St.3d 70.]

THE STATE EX REL. YORK, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE, ET AL. [Cite as State ex rel. York v. Indus. Comm., 2000-Ohio-18.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 00-36—Submitted July 25, 2000—Decided September 20, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 98AP-1195. __________________ Becker, Reed, Tilton & Hastings and Dennis A. Becker, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and William D. Haders, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., dissents. F.E. SWEENEY, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________